Quantcast

Gods vs God - Our God against your God - is always controversial and generally you would prefer to step clear of these, inorder not to hurt the sentiments of both sides. But at times we need to dwell on these to understand that whatever physical manifestations we see are but mere rungs of a ladder that are meant to take us to a higher plane and not to defend imaginary territories by laying anchor on these. So, as part of the site’s initiative to bring out purely the story behind sculpture, there are a few such which we cannot ignore - be it the more common Lingothbhavar, to the exotic Sarabeshwarar, to the Ganga’s origins on the other side. Having said that, these have been around for a 1000 years and form part of the religious framework and hence its our duty to look at them objectively. With that as a forward and a warning to increase your patience ( you may please leave now if you may wish !!) am going ahead with the first of this controversial sculpture series. Vishnu Anugraha Murthy and Chakra Dharanar. One is from the Madurai temple - could have been rebuilt post Malik Kafur’s assault - by the Nayak’s but the other is from 8th C CE - Rajasimha Pallava - kailasanathar temple Kanchipuram.

To make sure that this legend is not a figment of my imagination nor am i forced to concoct such a conspiracy theory am taking refuge in the Thevaram hymns of Appar at the outset.

Sixth Thirumurai

O Holy One whose crest is flower-laden,praise be!
O Ens hailed by the gods,praise be!
O Lord of gods,Praise be!
O Giver of the Disc to Tirumaal,praise be!
O One that saved me from Death and rules me,praise be!
O the Adept who is bedaubed with the ash that is white Like conch,praise be!
O the One whose victorious flag Displays the Bull,praise be,praise be!
O Tirumoolattaana,praise be,praise be!

Translation: T. N. Ramachandran,Thanjaavoor ,1995

Now that the ground work has been done and have ensured i have built all my defenses, proceeding with the story - well, there are many versions of it ( as usual).

Part 1:

To be brief - A wicked demon Jalandran gets a boon - who else but from Brahma. Shiva needs to slay him but since his wife is a devotee of his wants to use a proxy. Vishnu meantime needs a powerful weapon and does penance on Shiva ( hang on - dont crucify me just now - there is more to come) with 1000 lotus flowers. As luck could have it, he finds he is short by one - he being the lotus eyed one ( kamalakkannan) himself, he wastes no time in plucking his eye and offering to complete the 1000. ( now - don’t reach out for your daggers yet ! let me put across the exhibits as well)

The sculpture from Rajasimha Pallavas Kanchipuram Kailasanthar Temple:

kailasanatha+panel

Well, well - what do we have here now. The classic free wheeling style of the Pallava sculptor comes to the fore here. You can see the relaxed seated style of Siva, Stylistically folding one leg up, while he seems to leaning on his right hand for extra comfort. The Back two hands seem to be in the process of tying up his headdress or something of that sort. Vishnu on his part, kneeling on one knee - both his lower left and right hands seem to be in the act of offering something to Siva ( lotus flowers??) - the most interesting thing to note is the upper left hand - seems to be in act of plucking his left eye - a la Kannappar !!

closeup+vishnu+shiva+parvathi
shiva+parvathi
vishnu+offerring+his+eye

I for one expected a more balanced portrayal of the chief characters, but then that is maybe the core devotion that is the basis of this panel. You must be prepared to forgo your ego and submit totally to him to realise God.

But the next part, have to renew my life insurance at a hefty premium after seeing this in Madurai.

Part 2:

Pleased with Vishnu’s devotion, Shiva conjures up ( some versions say he drew a circle on the ground and cut out a discus form and proceeded to cut the demon into two himself and later presented it to Vishnu, some others say there were some more deceit involving the wife of the demon - am stepping away from these - not wanting to create more controversies- am sure you would google these up) - crux is Shiva gifts the Discus to Vishnu.

We swing across to the Madurai Meenakshi Amman temple to view this sculpture.

chakradharanar+madurai

That it is Vishnu and Shiva - with Brahma watching reverently by the side is clear from the relative attributes held. You can see that the cannons have become more rigid and the sculptor has merely sculpted to definition following set rules - leading to a duller or rather less artistic output.

shiva+presenting+to+vishnu
vishnu
vishnu+detail

It is a pillar sculpture but I do wish the sculptor be bit more balanced in depicting his subjects - especially the relative sizes and the problem is compounded by the size of Vishnu and he having to match the size of the discus to that of Vishnu. It would have been more pleasing both aesthetically and politically to have sculpted …. hmm, let me stop with that.

shiva+giving+discus+to+vishnu

Leave a comment »

Category: Sculpture

Tags:  , , , ,

Related Posts:

Read this in தமிழ்தமிழ்

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 4th, 2010 at 12:46 and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

20 Comments so far

  1  

a lovely post..am not sure whats so controversial here..i think the saivite -vaishnavite issues are hardly anything these days ..

May 4th, 2010 at 13:51
manii
  2  

there must be a similar thing about conch as well. awaiting your next blog on this…..

May 4th, 2010 at 14:30
Kathie B.
  3  

what’s ‘Ens’ in the 2nd line of Appar, please?

May 5th, 2010 at 8:20
  4  

சிற்பம் என்பது எங்கும் நிறைந்திருக்கும் ஒன்றை மனிதனின் மனதால் கட்டுப்படுத்தி செதுக்கப்பட்ட பொருள் என்று மட்டும் பார்க்காமல் மனதை கட்டுப்படுத்தி அடுத்த நிலைக்கு எடுத்தும் செல்லும் கருவி என்றே நாம் பார்க்கவேண்டும் supeeeer sir!

May 6th, 2010 at 0:35
  5  

What a wonderful post. While visiting Kailasanathar temple, I noticed the iconography referred by you but did not know the story behind that. Thanks.

May 6th, 2010 at 10:57
rhoda alex
  6  

its great that you highlight details that are normally taken for granted…
use of disproportionate sizes in art..was also used by the egyptians symbolically …dont know whether it is relevant here…nevertheless the link..http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/symbolism2.htm

May 7th, 2010 at 18:45
  7  

I have visited Kailasanathar temple. But haven’t noticed the sirpam. Netx time i’ll make it a point to capture this.
Thanks

May 7th, 2010 at 22:56
  8  

You have told the thing in truly Polite and informative way.

Kailasanatha Temple is such a treasure trove.

May 9th, 2010 at 10:14
  9  

Hi Kathie..

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ens
Metaphysics.
an existing or real thing; an entity.

vj

May 10th, 2010 at 7:41
  10  

hi rhoda

interesting perspective - yes - we did have clear defn for the placings - directions etc. regarding composition, though we had generic rule of thumb for each deity or major groups of sculptures - the relative sizes i think were left to the individual artists.

anbudan
vj

May 10th, 2010 at 13:43
anandhi natarajan
  11  

vj, Thirumaalukku aazi allitha idam Virkudu near tiruvarur is one of the veeratanam of siva. there u can see Siva giving chakra to vishu .here in panchloka sculpture
anandhi

May 14th, 2010 at 14:15
senthil kumar
  12  

தங்கள் நோக்கம் என்னவோ ? விஷ்ணு வை தாழ்த்தி பெருமானை உயர்த்துவதால் சைவம் தழைதுவிடும் என்ற என்னமோ ? …. தங்கள் அறியாமையை நினைத்தாள் பரிதாபமாக உள்ளது …. சிவ சிவ…. இந்த காழ்புணர்சி … இறைவன் அடியவருக்கு அழகா ?

May 18th, 2010 at 11:52
  13  

செந்தில் குமார் - ஆரம்பத்திலேயே எழுதி உள்ளேனே…

இந்த தளத்தின் நோக்கம் சிற்பங்களில் மறைந்து இருக்கும் கதைகளையும் நுணுக்கங்களையும் அனைவரும் விளங்கும் வண்ணம் எடுத்துச் சொல்வதே. கடந்து வந்த பாதை கரடு முரடானது. பல மதங்கள் காலப்போக்கில் ஒன்றுக்கொன்று போட்டி போட்டன, ஒரே மதங்களினுள்ளும் இந்த போட்டி நிலவியது. எனினும் இவையும் நமது பாரம்பரியத்தின் இழையாக பிணைந்து விட்டன. இவற்றில் சரி தவறு என்ற வாதங்களை எடுத்தாண்டு எதிரிகளாக நிற்காமல் இருப்பதை இருந்தாக பாருங்கள் என்பது முதல் வேண்டுகோள். இப்படி பார்க்கும் மனப்பக்குவம் இல்லாதவர்கள் தயவு செய்து இப்போதே மேலும் படிக்காமல் விலகி விடுங்கள் என்பது இரண்டாவது வேண்டுகோள்.”

May 18th, 2010 at 12:11
  14  

Wow, great story and great interpretation. Ofcourse Shaivite and vaishnavite are not so rigid these days, or it is how I assume it to be, however for me, I am just trying to understand the spirit of the sculptor and the theme, does not matter which god is big and which is inferior, afterall all gods are into one and one into many.

May 28th, 2010 at 15:00
  15  

hi saurabh

Well, the wounds and scars are deep. But lets try our best to interpret them from an artistic angle.

cheers
vj

May 28th, 2010 at 15:21
Pradeep
  16  

this and the sarabeshwara theories - when do you think they gained prominence?

Sadly, our habbit of praising somehting by pulling down another is still prevalent :-(

May 31st, 2010 at 12:36
  17  

@ pradeep - instead of going into dates we might go in this order first lingothbhava > vishnuanugrahamurthy> sarabeshwara.

May 31st, 2010 at 12:43
Pradeep
  18  

no Vijay, i meant whch period did all this start? I am thinking before Nayaka , late Chola

May 31st, 2010 at 16:37
  19  

hi pradeep

The two depictions featured in the post are spanning a wide period between them. the kanchi kailasanatha is a authentic rajsimha structure 700 -730 AD. The madurai is obviously a later creation - post malik kafur’s onslaught 1314AD.

lingothbhava as a concept seems to evolve from representing shiva as a pillar of fire ….seen as early as in the pillayarpatti cave.

as regards sarabamurthy - could be western chalukyan influence - early depictions are in Darasuram ( Rajaraja 2) and Tribuvanam (kulottunga 3 ) late 12th C.

vj

May 31st, 2010 at 17:49
Mani
  20  

let all great leaders of all religion read this and be enlightened that god is one in many forms and vice versa

March 5th, 2011 at 20:19

Leave a Reply

Name (required)(*)
Mail (will not be published)(*)
URI
Comment