Quantcast

There was a big hue and cry about the Chola King bronze ” said ” to be Sri Raja Raja Chola during the 1000th year anniversary of the Tanjore Big temple.

10THBRONZE_178422e
10th-icons08_thasr__178742e

We had done a detailed post on the same bronze and other portraits of Kings wherein we had approximated the size of the bronze based on this inscription

“14. One solid image of Periya-Perumal, having two sacred arms (and measuring) one mulam, four viral and a half in height from the feet to the hair.”

Lets take Mulam as approx 15 inches and 41/2 virals to mean half of a mulam - so totals up to 22.5 inches or 57 centimeters.

The bronze in the Sarabhai Museum is described by Sri. P. R. Srinivasan as ” The bronze representing a Chola King, height 74 cm “ in his book on Bronzes of South India ( P.R. Srinivasan (F.E. 1963, L.R. 1994))

rrc+srabahai.jpg

Let us see the characteristics of this ” Chola” King once more

sara+rrc+crown+face.jpg
sara+rrc+hands+flowers.jpg
sara+rrc+hands.jpg
sara+rrc+legs.jpg
sarabhai+rrc+anklet

The Key here to the identity that is indeed a ruler is the “veerakazhal” or bravery anklet worn on the left leg.

sara+rrc+legs.jpg

Now, a year ago a reputed auction site listed this interesting bronze for auction with a base price of $ 60,000 to $80,000

A Large Bronze Figure of Chandikeshvara
SOUTH INDIA, CHOLA DYNASTY, 10TH/11TH CENTURY

d1868500x

It is interesting to compare the features of this ” Chandikeshvara” to the accepted bronzes in the Museums in Chennai and Tanjore.

chandi_maa_10cce
chandi_maa_10cce2
chandi_tnj

If you noticed none of them have the anklet on.

Now let us see the ” chandikeshvara” bronze up close and compare to the “Chola” King.

face
anjali
anklet

No doubt this is definitely not Chandikeshwara but a Chola King.

The dimensions as per the auction house is :

247/8 in. (63.1 cm.) high

Which compares more favorably to the dimensions in the Big temple inscriptions

There is no mention of any dates and specific in the Provenance:

Pre-Lot Text

PROPERTY FROM A EUROPEAN COLLECTION

So is this the bronze of the Great Emperor that we should have brought back to the Tanjore Temple ? Sadly he sold below the list price for $ 58,750.

Leave a comment »

Category: Sculpture

Tags:  , ,

Related Posts:

Read this in தமிழ்தமிழ்

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 20th, 2014 at 12:46 and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Comments so far

N.Paramasivam
  1  

Is there any way that Indian Government can lodge a claim and seize stolen idol.

March 20th, 2014 at 13:10
Kirubasankar
  2  

The sold one is not our Raja Raja cholan’s statue. The things like Kazhal, kai koopiya nilai and ornaments are looking same. But see the faces and the crown of the previous one and the sold one are not same.

March 20th, 2014 at 14:57
  3  

dear Kirubasankar

request to please read the post properly - and before that read this as well - http://poetryinstone.in/2010/08/26/portrait-bronzes-of-chola-kings-a-study-from-past-references.html

anbudan
vj

March 20th, 2014 at 15:17
Rajagopal
  4  

I am pretty lost reading such auction details, does that mean these have been stolen from our Peria Kovil & further sold, have changed several hands? Is there no way to recover them & to restore it to our Kovil & meuseums, they belong to our culture & country right?

March 20th, 2014 at 16:02
Prasanna
  5  

Dear Rajagopal,

Stolen or ported legally is not the question, I believe. This is a symbol of our culture, and at any means it should be in our land, and particularly where and how it was intended to be.

March 20th, 2014 at 21:06
sivakumar
  6  

யக்யோப வீதம் எல்லா சந்டிகேஷ்வர படிமங்களிலும் உள்ளது . அதேபோல் இதிலும் உள்ளது . சோழ அரச சிற்பத்தில் யக்யோப வீதம் உள்ளதா என அறிய இயலவில்லை. வீர கழல் இரண்டிலும் உள்ளது . உங்கள் ஒப்புமை நன்றாக உள்ளது .

சிவகுமார்

March 31st, 2014 at 13:44

Leave a Reply

Name (required)(*)
Mail (will not be published)(*)
URI
Comment